A slower Speed of Light is a video game developed by MIT Game Lab that demonstrates the relationship between space and time! Via A Slower Speed of Light is a first-person game prototype in which players navigate a 3D space while picking up orbs that reduce the speed of light in increments.

Custom-built, open-source relativistic graphics code allows the speed of light in the game to approach the player’s own maximum walking speed. Visual effects of special relativity gradually become apparent to the player, increasing the challenge of gameplay. These effects, rendered in realtime to vertex accuracy, include the Doppler effect (red- and blue-shifting of visible light, and the shifting of infrared and ultraviolet light into the visible spectrum); the searchlight effect (increased brightness in the direction of travel); time dilation (differences in the perceived passage of time from the player and the outside world); Lorentz transformation (warping of space at near-light speeds); and the runtime effect (the ability to see objects as they were in the past, due to the travel time of light). Players can choose to share their mastery and experience of the game through Twitter.

A Slower Speed of Light combines accessible gameplay and a fantasy setting with theoretical and computational physics research to deliver an engaging and pedagogically rich experience. Stop breadboarding and soldering – start making immediately! Adafruit’s Circuit Playground is jam-packed with LEDs, sensors, buttons, alligator clip pads and more. Build projects with Circuit Playground in a few minutes with the, learn computer science using the CS Discoveries class on code.org, jump into to learn Python and hardware together, or even use Arduino IDE. Is the newest and best Circuit Playground board, with support for MakeCode, CircuitPython, and Arduino. It has a powerful processor, 10 NeoPixels, mini speaker, InfraRed receive and transmit, two buttons, a switch, 14 alligator clip pads, and lots of sensors: capacitive touch, IR proximity, temperature, light, motion and sound.

A whole wide world of electronics and coding is waiting for you, and it fits in the palm of your hand. Join 8,700+ makers on and be part of the community! Have an amazing project to share? Join the SHOW-AND-TELL every Join us every Wednesday night at 8pm ET for for top secret new products, behinds the scenes and more.

Physicist: Back in the day, Galileo came up with the “Galilean Equivalence Principle” (GEP) which states that all the laws of physics work exactly the same, regardless of how fast you’re moving, or indeed whether or not you’re moving. (Acceleration is a different story.

Acceleration screws everything up.) What Einstein did was to tenaciously hold onto the GEP, regardless of what common sense and everyone around told him. It turns out that the speed of light can be derived from a study of. But if physics is the same for everybody, then the speed of light (hereafter “C”) must be the same for everybody. The new principle, that the laws of physics are independent of velocity and that C is the same for everybody, is called the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP). Moving faster makes time slow down: I’ve found that the best way to understand this is to actually do the calculation, then sit back and think about it. Now, if a relativistic argument doesn’t hinge on the invariance of C, then it isn’t relativistic.

So ask yourself “What do the speed of light and time have to do with each other?”. A good way to explore the connection is a “light clock”. A light clock is a pair of mirrors, a fixed distance apart, that bounce a photon back and forth and.clicks. at every bounce.

What follows is essentially the exact thought experiment that Einstein proposed to derive how time is affected by movement. The proper time 'τ' is how long it takes for the clock to tick if you're moving with it. The world time 't' is the time it takes for the clock to tick if you're moving with a relative velocity of V. Let’s say Alice is holding a light clock, and Bob is watching her run by, while holding it, with speed V.

Alice is standing still (according to Alice), and the time, between ticks is easy to figure out: it’s just. From Bob’s perspective the photon in the clock doesn’t just travel up and down, it must also travel sideways, to keep up with Alice. The additional sideways motion means that the photon has to cover a greater distance, and since it travels at a fixed speed (EEP y’all!) it must take more time. The exact amount of time can be figured out by thinking about the distances involved.

Mix in a pinch of Pythagoras and Boom!: the time between ticks for Bob. So Bob sees Alice’s clock ticking slower than Alice does. You can easily reverse this experiment (just give Bob a clock), and you’ll see that Alice sees Bob’s clock running slow in exactly the same way. It turns out that the really useful quantity here is the ratio:.

This equation is called “gamma”. It’s so important in relativity I’ll say it again:. It may seem at first glance that the different measurements are an illusion of some kind, like things in the distance looking smaller and slower, but unfortunately that’s not the case. For Alice the light definitely travels a shorter distance, and the clock ticks faster. For Bob the light really does travel a greater distance, and the clock ticks slower. If you’re wondering why there’s no paradox, or want more details, then find yourself a book on relativity.

There are plenty. (The very short answer is that position is also important.) The lower the slower: Less commonly known, is that the lower you are in a gravity well, the slower time passes.

So someone on a mountain will age (very, very slightly) faster than someone in a valley. This falls into the realm of general relativity, and the derivation is substantially more difficult. Einstein crapped out special relativity in a few months, but it took him another 10 years to get general relativity figured out. Here’s a good way to picture why (but not quite derive how) acceleration causes nearby points to experience time differently. Redder light at the top, bluer light at the bottom.

Alice and Bob (again) are sitting at opposite ends of an accelerating rocket (that is to say; the rocket is on, so they’re speeding up). Alice is sitting at the Apex (top) of the rocket and she’s shining a red light toward Bob at the Bottom of the rocket. It takes some time (not much) for the light to get from the Apex of the rocket to the Bottom.

In that time Bob has had a chance to speed up a little, so by the time the light gets to him it will be a little bit. Again, Alice sees red light at the Apex and Bob sees blue light at the Bottom. Counting the blue crests is faster than counting the red crests.

However, since it's all the same light beam the number of crests has to be the same to everybody. The time between wave crests for Bob are short, the time between wave crests for Alice are long.

Say for example that the blueshift increases the frequency by a factor of two, and Alice counts 10 crests per second. Then Bob will count 20 crests per second (No new crests are being added in between the top and the bottom of the rocket). Therefore, 2 seconds of Alice’s time happens in 1 second of Bob’s time.

A Slower Speed Of Light Gameplay

Alice is moving through time faster. Einstein’s insight (a way bigger jump than the EEP) was that gravitational acceleration and inertial acceleration are one and the same.

So the acceleration that pushes you down in a rocket does all the same things that the acceleration due to gravity does. There’s no way to tell if the rocket is on and you’re flying through space, or if the rocket is off and you’re still on the launch pad. It’s worth mentioning that the first time you read this it should be very difficult to understand. Relativity = mind bending.

David Says “so we basically wouldn’t have to reach 300 000,rather find a direction to which to go in order to maximize our speed relative to the stillness in space which is 0 km/h? ” That is a question I have been been wrestling with some time David. What if we just stopped how fast would time go?

If we stopped in some point in space relative to all other things in the universe then there must be a nominal speed of time for us compared to someone traveling at close to the speed at of light? Or is it that space is expanding around us and therefore it is impossible to stop? My Brain is hurting now. @Jamie Miller You’re always sitting still with respect to yourself and you’re always moving through time at the maximum possible rate according to your own clock.

Relativity is called “relativity” because the only kind of velocity that matters is velocity relative to something else. The big idea to keep in mind is that every individual thing in the universe has its own clock and time dilation is all about how those clocks relate to each other.

But the universe itself does not have a clock. There’s no “true clock” to compare against. “the only kind of velocity that matters is velocity relative to something else.” This is a very subjective statement for a physicist. Whether or not velocity matters or not is of no matter. I suspect what is meant is that the only velocity that can be observed is velocity relative to something else and that this relative velocity has no meaning in spacetime.

UNLESS, the relative velocity is observed relative to a photon. However, there is no absolute method of measuring the velocity of a passing photon since your unknown spacetime velocity affects the observation and any observation method you use will return the same velocity c independent of your own unknown (but very real) velocity.